Skip to main content

Bleed: when larp changes you


Whether we realize it or not, and whether we try to hide it or actively embrace it, one thing is certain - our in-character and out-of-character personalities often mix, and perceptions and emotion often mix. In Nordic larp there's even a word used specifically for it - bleed. From the jeepform dictionary:

Bleed is experienced by a player when her thoghts and feelings are influenced by those of her character, or vice versa. With increasing bleed, the border between player and character becomes more and more transparent. It makes sense to think of the degree of bleed as a measure of how separated different levels of play (actual/inner/meta) are.

There are two concepts for designing larp characters in terms of closeness.

Differentiation allows us to play characters which are radically different from ourselves. A mighty warrior. A religious fanatic. A wealthy statesman. A stealthy assassin. A powerful wizard. And many more. Differentiation can help us learn new insights about other people.

Playing "close to home" is playing characters which are intentionally similar to ourselves, with similar issues players themselves have or once had - illness, violence, addiction, relationship issues, unwanted pregnancies, deaths in the family etc. Playing close to home can help us learn new insights about ourselves. The effect is typically stronger and more realistic than if the same character was played by a person who had no such experiences.

While bleed can occur either way, it's typically much stronger and more common if you play "close to home". Note that it's a separate effect from immersion - though immersion often causes bleed, and vice versa.

Bleed can have a large impact both ways - both on the way we play (by putting our personal emotions into it) and on the way it affects us as players (because it does).

Bleed is very important, but also dangerous. It can let a larp affect us on a very deep and personal level. It can help players deal with their real life situations. But it's also been known to wreck relationships. People with in-character relationships falling in love with one another has been quite common, especially in Nordic countries since they commonly play for high bleed. It's very important to recognize bleed and how it affects us.

New players commonly have rather shallow characters similar to themselves - this is not instinctively "playing close to home", it's just new players testing the larp waters and being a bit shy. There are some methods to address it, such as running a pre-game workshop to get players comfortable with one another and introduce or reaffirm the game’s expectations, themes and mechanics (which is a good idea in general).

Players who talk about their characters all the time is also not bleed. Players who use their out-of-character knowledge for in-character benefits are meta-gaming (which is a whole different subject), not having bleed. If you always tend to group up with certain people on a larp and never with others, it can be bleed, but not necessarily. People who find an in-character excuse to mess you up out-of-character (or vice versa) are just being dicks, they're not doing it because of bleed.

Bleed is about strong, personal emotions caused by or spilled into a game. In horror atmosphere, it's often used to scare a player to scare his character (vice versa won't usually work as well). A strong leader in reality will also make a convincing strong leader on a larp. In romance situations, it's using your personal experiences with past relationship to manage your in-character relationships. Or re-living relationship situations. It's not uncommon that your in-character relationships influence how you feel out of game.

For these reasons, many nordic larps (which are heavy on bleed) feature "debriefings" at the end of the game, a structured post-larp talk among participants where they can discuss their experiences and get their feelings sorted enough to return to their own lives. Talking about it can help people assimilate and understand their larp experiences. Such debriefings are considered an essential feature of player safety on bleed-heavy larps (which commonly deal with diffucult subjects). Implementing more of these would probably be a good idea for any larp.

In a more gamistic larp environments, bleed is often seen as a more negative thing. Perhaps as a form of escapism. It can interfere with the game and create personal issues in the community, so it's often avoided.

In general, bleed is neither positive or negative. It can be either (or both), depending on your situation. But it's important to realize there will always be some bleed on a larp. You're experiencing larp fully and the truth is, it can change you and it can change your life.

In which situations did bleed affect you or your characters? Think about it, try to remember what and why you did. Feel free to put it in the comments if you want to share it.

And always be aware of it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 15 rules of larp

The following 15 rules (warning: strong language) were written some years ago in Great Britain, and have been pretty much generally accepted on the British larp scene. Especially popular is rule 7 - widely known by its number and commonly considered to be the most imortant rule of all (and I agree). Even the biggest British larp forum has taken Rule7 as its name. The rules have been originally created by the Drunken Monkeys and edited by Rick Wynne who added some extra stuff in the explanations to make them more understandable to international audience (it still contains some British larp lingo though), more work-safe and to throw in his two cents. (copy of the original wording is available here ) 1. Don’t play a mighty warrior; play a warrior and be mighty. Don’t label your character. As soon as you say that you are the best swordsman in the land someone will come along and kick your ass. Just get into the mindset of the person and role-play it out. 2. No one cares about you...

TESC IV: Ebonheart review

TESC is a Croatian Elder Scrolls-inspired larp, started by Marko Zadro and ran by him and his team for more than 4 years so far. During its first two years of existence, four larps were ran (the second was the one actually counted as first, as first larp was counted as playtest) which were well-received, well-visited and raised the visual level of Croatian fantasy larps. Yet TESC IV: Ebonheart was a whole different beast altogether. General ideas were formed by organizers far before the logistics to do them became available, and 2.5 years elapsed between the previous larp of the series and this one. Also, this is the first larp so far directly inspired by the organizer's (and mine) favorite game of the series, Morrowind. Inspired by the European blockbuster castle larps, TESC IV became the first Croatian blockbuster castle larp - although at the far lower entrance price (€85 as opposed to €500+ price typical of those). While this means production values weren't exact...

It's been way too long without any updates

  I'm just back from PoRtaL XII, which was back in Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 6 years after PoRtaL VI , which is - incidentally - only 3 posts below this one on my blog, and I still remember it like it was yesterday. And this means I failed to review the past two year's PoRtaLs, also excellent. Here's some representation for them. Back during PoRtaL 10 in Krakow, I did a presentation called  Designing larps with intent . It was streamed, and can be found on Youtube. For PoRtaL 10, I also wrote and ran a larp Journey to Tau Ceti - an expanded version of the Arrival at Tau Ceti. I was a mess at documenting it, and it still remains in an unpublishable state. Both of these were run on Friday, which means I haven't really see much else on the convention that day, but I did on Saturday, when I was also able to play Ties that Bind larp by Alexandros Alexiou. I skipped Sunday, as we had to go early to drive home. For documentation purposes, full program listing is here . At next year...